I am six years old. I am in the backyard of a villa in Al Jumeirah, Dubai. I am naked and I can feel the sun radiating ever inch of my body. I am holding Mr. Bunny’s ears and scorning him in a language only I can understand. Then for the first time I hear it, a low painful cry, my mother’s cry. I am confused. How did I get here again? How did you get here Grace? What can you last remember? I feel frustrated and I begin to feel anxious. The cry comes again through my mother’s balcony door. I glared at Mr. Bunny. Although I could not remember the reason of my contempt for him at that moment, Mr. Bunny knew. Looking into his lazy, unconcerned eyes, I bop him in the head hoping he feels remorse. I jump up and run towards my mom’s room. My older brother Steve is standing in front of the door to my parent’s room. I stand beside him and ask him in a very serious tone “attuhhummah”? Unresponsive, I did what I did best when I was frustrated. I bopped him in the head. Always mature and calm, my brother took me by the hand towards my room. As he began to dress me, he explained calmly “baby died”. I froze up and began to pee.
Sometimes when someone tells me their sibling got all the good genes I smile to myself because in my case, there’s some truth to that saying. My very Christian mother has always been very tiny. When doctors confirmed she was pregnant with me, they suggested I be aborted. Her body could not provide all the nourishment I needed, and the chances I would be a stillbirth or mentally/physically challenged were very high. My family disregarded the doctors concerns, and my mother put my fate in her God’s hands. I was born 5 pounds, malnourished, with an underdeveloped brain. Till the age of 8, I struggled with frequent memory loss and did not form proper speech till the age of 14.
Reading Perez-Pena’s article Christie’s Conservatism is Not Just Economic I find myself with a confused outlook on abortion. As Perez-Pena criticizes Govenor Christie’s (of New Jersey) right winged, conservative act on lowering funds for planned parenthoods, I find myself recalling memories of Dubai. I remember how invaluable and stupid I felt not being able to communicate like other children and constantly forgetting how I got from point A to point B. I remember how lonely it was. But I realize I have been given a chance. Because my family did not stand for abortion as it is not apart of Korean culture nor was it okay by God, I was given a chance. But then my mind wanders as to how my mother must have felt. Trapped by her duties to her religion, she had no choice. It would be God’s will. Seven months before she had my youngest brother, doctors had warned her, his birth could lead to her death but her best case would be another “challenged” child. I wonder if my mother resented her God for having a disabled daughter who got lost often in large markets. I wonder how a mother felt knowing she might have to die before she could raise her children. I try to grasp how my mother must have felt after spending sleepless nights watching baby Mathew through his incubator. I can only contemplate how my mom felt lying in bed mourning a lost son who only felt the pains of death for his short three-month life.
In past conversations my mother has admitted if she had her way she would have aborted me and there probably wouldn’t have been a Mathew afterwards. I’m always confused to hear my mother say this. I have never questioned my mother’s relentless love for me and I understand at the time, doctors believed my stem cells would never develop a full functioning brain. I understand raising a disabled person must be excruciating but I also understand the lump that forms in my throat. And at that instance I am grateful she did not have a choice because I was given a chance. But reading Perez-Pena’s article I begin to feel guilty. Governor Christie’s attempt to strip mothers of a choice to abort her child or not because of his views seems unethical. Lowering funding for plant parenthoods, he’s financially disabling possible mothers from aborting and restricting them from contraceptives. I realize everything is relative. My circumstance was a miracle and even at that it was painful for my mother and I. All too often growing up, I hated my life. I hated I could not talk to other children, I hated Mr. Bunny was my only friend especially since he was mean. I resented me. Although my mother would never admit it, I think at times she could have resented me too. I had doctors appointments every week, got lost everywhere and anywhere, my mother had no time for anything but me. My circumstance was a miracle because I was able to grow out of my disability. But I imagine if I had not, my mother would not be the vibrant, gooshy mother she is for me today.
If my mother had a choice nineteen years ago, I would not be here. Although I am grateful to be alive, I can still hear her devastated cry standing outside her bedroom door. I can still remember how weary she looked whenever she found me lost. Every case is relative. Conservative Governor Christie’s seems to look at the issue of Planned Parenthood and abortion through a black and white mentality. Although I thought I would have a more concrete side on abortion by the end of this paper, I believe most of the issues in life fall under a grey area. There seems to be no clear answer but to understand everyone’s choice must be relative to their own happiness.
Hey Grace!
ReplyDeleteI wanted to start off by saying that you did a really good job of using such a personal topic for your narrative essay assignment. It must have been hard for you to share something so personal and intimate like that. The first sentence of your essay was short and a good suspenseful lead in. It made me want to look on and read further. Your introduction paragraph put us in your shoes and made us feel the same confusion you did, wondering why your mother was making those screams. The details in the second paragraph that explained what an impact your mothers’ tiny figure could have on your birth were astounding. It was little surprising details you added in like the fact that you were 14 when you formed proper speech patterns that really made the reader emphasize and understand your challenges. In your third paragraph when you described your mother’s mind set when making birth decisions you really showed the reader the difficulties and emotional stress your mom suffered through when having you and your brother. Your story was mostly narrative and very passionate and filled with rich details that helped the reader truly understand where you’re coming from.
There were only a few areas in your essay that I saw that could use improvement. First of all there were a few grammatical errors such as placing in “that” and some commas. I showed where I thought these errors needed to be fixed on your paper that is printed and attached. I was also curious if the word “attuhhummah” in your first paragraph was a word in another language, or an example of you struggling with speech. I also wish you had explained what exactly went wrong with your little brother when your mother gave birth to him that caused his death. The only other thing I was unsure about was the sentence in your concluding paragraph that talked about the Governors’ black and white mentality. I don’t think it fit very well where it was placed or helped to add much to your main point. One more improvement that could help your paper is to state clearly what your main argument is. I think generally the reader knows that you are speaking against abortion, however you should still make sure that your main argument is stated somewhere clearly in your essay. Overall I really liked your paper and I think it was one of the most emotionally charged one’s from this class that I have read so far.
Grace,
ReplyDeleteYou have a very personal and relevant story here that admits confusion while pointing out uncertainty.
I think you could do more at the beginning to get us right into the action. Try imagining telling this story as if you were six years old. Would you really say, "I am six years old."? How else can you establish obvious details like that?
Parts of your paper have a bit of a comedic feel to it that I'm not sure I like or dislike. Bopping on the head (Mr. Bunny and your brother) are pretty laughable. Again, I don't know if I like this comedic element, but if you want it to be a little comedic, then certainly leave it in there.
I would like to see more support to the claim that "everything is relative." I wasn't sure exactly what you were referring to, since everything is a pretty all-encompasing subject.
I don't know enough about Perez-Pena's article for you to have discussed it as much as you did. I think background would be helpful and also establish relativeness.
I don't like that you broke the wall between speaker and audience in the last paragraph when you used "in this paper." Since you're not calling your audience to action, I don't think it serves its purpose to directly speak to them.
-Matthew Fisher
Grace,
ReplyDeleteWhat a great start to the paper! This topic is very difficult to discuss but you did a great job on incorporating your narrative in with it.
However, in the beginning you talk about your brother. This is a amazing paragraph full of details. But, the next paragraph changes to be about you. Which is your central story? Having both got me a bit confused in thinking that there were two introductions to two different stories.
I also was a bit confused on your claim/argument? At a few points you mentioned Planned Parenthood and then I wondered if you were going to try and argue that the funding shouldn't be cut in more detail but then you moved towards abortion and what that is like. Then you talked about disabilities. Although your essay is so good and has so many great ideas, I think that you need to focus them to create a central claim. That will make it even better
Great start!
Peggy
Grace,
ReplyDeleteThis is a great start to a powerful narrative. I commend you on writing about such a personal and emotional story. You provide a lot of detail and I could picture everything that was going on and how you were feeling throughout your story (to some extent of course). You really brought us through your life instead of describing one instance in your life and I thought doing that allowed the audience to really get a grasp of your life which was great. I also loved that you described Mr. Bunny and how he was always there for you during the good and trying times in your life.
I only found a few things that could further improve your paper into a stronger one. I can't find a solid claim that you are making so I think that if you mention it in a sentence or two then the paper will become clearer. Also, I would love more background on the Perez-Pena article so it can add even more to your credibility. Finally, the sentence "Although I thought I would have a more concrete side on abortion by the end of this paper, I believe most of the issues in life fall under a grey area." in the last paragraph has the right idea but it takes the audience out of your story. I think that just by rewording the general idea of the sentence it would flow better in the paragraph. I hope this helps!
Rachel
Grace,
ReplyDeleteYou did a great job explaining the whole problem throughout the essay, i also liked how you used your sources periodically through the paper. And your paper is one of the only ones that i read that you explain where you got your article from and why it is important. I really find your story to be very insane and i am just imagining how scary that must have been for your mother. And then look at you now in college with a fully developed brain trying to make something of yourself. The detail in this essay was good because you explained to us why she had to have you and not want an abortion but then you also stated that if it was up to your mom she would not have had you. There are some minor sentences that you may need to change here and there but you did a great job and it will be weird to have you sit in class and not critique an essay.
Good job,
Colby
Grace,
ReplyDeleteI think this is a great choice of topic because it's so personal to you. It's hard to open yourself up to an audience like that, but I think you did a great job.
The scene in the beginning was written very well. I loved how you used a lot of short sentences because it created a fast past, which was appropriate because I really wanted to keep reading.
The issue I had was with your claim. You mentioned several different things that could each be its own topic so I was never really able to pinpoint the one on which you were focusing. Be sure to be clear. Clarity will give this essay much more strength.
Otherwise, there were some grammatical errors with tenses and such, but those can easily be fixed with a few read-throughs.
Great first draft. Good luck with the next one!
Justine
Grace,
ReplyDeleteYou did a phenomenal job with this paper, it felt incredibly heartfelt and personal and I honestly experienced a ton of emotions reading this that I usually don't get from simply reading an essay. Small grammatical errors and a lack of sources aside, this is an amazing paper.
Josh
Grace,
ReplyDeleteThis is a fantastic, personal topic for a narrative argument. It's a beautiful story. Thank you for sharing it. I really like the narrative elements of your writing, though sometimes you tend to tell us and not "show us."
My recommendation for you is to have word vomit before writing your next draft. Close your eyes and wrie everything that comes to mind when you picture the events of your past. As far as how you feel now (the argument you're trying to make), play word association. What are the first things that come to your mid when someone says:
-abortion
-cut funding
-chris christie
These are just examples, but really write everything you feel so that your ideas snowball into something that's easy to work with. The more thoughts you put on paper, the higher the chance of seeing a phrase that sparks your argument.
This may also help you to choose a definite side of your argument, because your technique right now is very Rogerian, with a lot of acknowledgement and response.
You're not far off the beaten path here, Grace. This is going to be a great paper once you iron out your thoughts and find a source or two to back you up.
--Francesca
This is a super personal story so it was so easy for me to get absorbed in your story. I understand why a lot of your paper is story, because you needed to convey the extremity of the situation. Obviously, the paper needs work though. To convey an argument or claim you need to "make up your mind" about the paper. I understand the conundrum you are facing since you must evaluate the situation of your health and your mothers. Unfortunately, to have a specific argument you'll need to narrow your claim and have a less open ended conclusion. Your sources are great though and really contribute to the topic, just take some time to really evaluate what these sources mean to you. This will be difficult but i know that no one understands this situation better than you, so you have to make your voice very determined and assured of your argument.
ReplyDelete-joe
Hi Grace,
ReplyDeleteThe beginning of this essay was so wonderful. I felt like I was reading a story 6 year old Grace wrote. You completely captured me. Unfortunately I got lost as I read on. I didn't exactly understand what your argument was. It seemed like you were arguing against yourself. If you do not have an argument and your are just bringing light onto this topic, make that clear. If you are directly arguing the governer's point of view, do it. My advice to you is, because the topic of abortion is so broad, pick just one part of abortion and work with that.
Overall, great job. Thank you for letting us into this extremely personal topic. I was extremely attached to this essay as I was reading. Well done.
Anna